In the end, America keeps losing children, teachers, brothers, and sisters. The population is decreased, but the problem persists. With all these shooting sprees looming above us like the Grim Reaper, is gun control what we really need? Or is there a more serious problem we are facing here?
Why not, when guns have not been banned in some states? In Australia in , 35 people died when a man indiscriminately shot them. In the melee, 23 were wounded. This prompted the Australian government to think and implement strict rules regarding gun use. As a result, the number of mass killings in the Land Down Under has been reduced, if not completely eradicated. There are politicians in America who support stronger gun control, such as Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Both of them thought of Australia as the model for stringent gun laws.
Other people argue that they need firearms because they use it for self-defense. They acquire a license for it, and as such, they are expected to use their weapons only when the need arises.
Burglars, hostage attacks, and other forms of violence require people to stand up and fight, preferably with their weapon of choice. Life is precious, they say, and they can only protect their lives if they have the proper equipment. The second amendment states that the right of people to keep their arms should not be infringed by any means.
The amendment mentions a well- regulated militia which is a phrase that means a group of citizens that act in position of an army. It continues to describe that it is necessary to the security of a free state. In this phrase, it means that the group will be in the frontline in making sure that it meets the goals and the interests of the citizen army. The main objective of the citizen army is to protect the best interests of the country, as well as, protecting the government also from foreign intervention.
This means that when the gun control laws are being introduced, the main intention of introducing the second amendment is being assumed. This means that the country would be left at the stake of only the military and the citizens would not have the power of protecting their government, as well as, the best interests of their nation Lott Another main reason why the second amendment was made was that the South would be able to control the slaves.
Guns would be essential in helping carry out slavery in the South at ease. Therefore, state militias served as slave patrols where they had to be given the mandate and responsibility to hold guns so that they would be able to control the slaves. The second amendment was also made because of the rebellions that used to take place in the country.
For example, the whiskey rebellion caused the government to revoke the amendment as a way of controlling the militias in helping stop the rebellion. The farmers were rebelling against the government for imposing a new tax, yet it had not been there previously. When the amendment was made, room for rebel had not been created against the government. However, such rebellions were experienced when the government was not in a position to meet certain needs of the people or it acted in such a way that people viewed as selfish or had corrupt intentions.
For this reason, the state has been enjoying its democratic right because rebellions and demonstrations are respected because the government realizes the power within the people. If such power had not been vested in the people, it would be difficult in the United States to stage rebellions and demonstrations in fight for human rights and freedom.
Imposing gun control laws in the country is, therefore, a way of curtailing freedom in the United States, as the people may lack the voice and the authority they had previously Bijlefeld There has also been an argument that it is not the guns that kill people, but it is the people themselves who kill other people. In this context, those against the gun controls argue that it is a personal initiative for a criminal to engage in crime, whether he holds a gun or not.
In this regard, he does not have to possess gun for him to hold a gun. More comparisons are made between other weapons that are used to kill people and the guns that are always blamed for being used in killing people. People use crude weapons including screwdrivers, knives, swords or any metallic objects if they have the intention to kill other people. The gun just necessitates and quickens the process, and they argue that the killing would still have taken place, in the absence of the gun.
Therefore, before placing the gun control laws as a measure to reduce violence and crime, more research should be indulged and there should be other actions that ought to be taken as a way of reducing the violence. For example, most people who commit these crimes are usually in the influence of high drug intoxication. It is these drugs that will make them use the guns or other weapons around them in committing violence. The best way to help reduce violence in such a person would not be confiscating the gun he is carrying, but rehabilitating him as a way to reduce the drug use in him.
There is the extreme anti gun control standpoint suggesting against any control over firearm turnover, there is the extreme pro gun control standpoint insisting on state monopoly on all gun possession, and all the wide variety of in-betweens. If we try and look at the root of the issue, we see that it all comes down to the Second Amendment. It was passed back in as a part of the Bill of Rights. Given all the time passed since, it has naturally been clarified by numerous court cases and rulings since then.
However, we still cannot see the end to this discussion, which means that the clarifications made are not nearly sufficient to conclude the issue once and for all. This, in turn, provides for a very fertile ground for discussion to you as a student who has to write a gun control essay. Regardless of which standpoint you take - pro or anti gun control, you will still have enough material not only for an essay but even for a Ph.
So, at least, you will not have to worry about the lack of research material. As you can see, there is a lot to be said in a gun control essay. The possible approaches to the issue may vary a great deal, but the topic itself is extremely broad - it has been under discussion on all levels for over years and the discussion is still far from over!
For you, as a student, it means that you can be assigned to write any kind of academic paper on this topic - from small gun control essays for high school and up to a master's thesis or even a Ph.
Let us take a closer look at some of these essay types:. Given the nature of our topic, it is most interesting to write argumentative and persuasive essays on gun control. Hence, these are the essays that students are most often asked to write on gun control.
The first thing you need for an excellent argumentative essay is an exciting topic with at least two conflicting standpoints.
With gun control, it should not pose any problem. The next thing you need is a powerful argument. Obviously, for that, you need to adopt either a pro or an anti gun control standpoint.
Notably, this choice will not always be up to you. Your teacher may ask you to write a pro gun control argumentative essay, even if do not share this opinion. In this case, you will still have to gather solid evidence to support your argument. You should think of it as valuable training. Besides, to write an excellent argumentative essay, you need a solid understanding of both "your" argument and the opposing one.
So, on the bright side, you already have that. Once you have that, you move on to research. As you may guess, you should not focus on your side of the argument exclusively. On the contrary, a strong gun control argumentative essay has to present two conflicting views on the issue.
So, you have to conduct some research in both directions. After conducting your research, you should outline your essay and move on to writing. Like any other essay, your argumentative essay on gun control will consist of three parts: The introduction is where you present your topic, some background information, and your opinion which you set out to prove in your essay. The main body is where you present both sides of the argument and your opinion on the issue along with an explanation of why you stand in favor of this particular opinion.
Finally, you conclude your gun control argumentative essay with re-stating your opinion and pointing out why it makes sense. On a first glance, a persuasive essay may seem not that much different from an argumentative one.
However, there is a drastic difference between them. An argumentative essay focuses on proving your point logically, whereas a persuasive essay is aimed at convincing your reader that you are right. This may seem vague, so let us take a closer look. There are three commonly accepted ways of persuasion: Ethos appeals to the reader's sense of ethics and employs the author's authority on the issue. Pathos appeals to the reader's emotions and employs the irrational.
Narrative gun control essay. In a narrative essay, you tell a story about an experience – yours or someone else’s, real-life or fictional. You can tell a story about guns and what happened because of certain gun control regulations or what could have happened if they were different.
Gun Control Essay. Joscelyn Garcia English Instructor: Nancy Cassano Essay 2 2/13/ Gun Control in America The United States government should have the authority to restrict and regulate American citizens from buying or owning firearms.
Evidently, gun control as an essay topic gives the most fertile ground for persuasive and argumentative essays. So, these are the most common kinds of essays that students have to write on gun control. Essay on Gun Control There have been arguments regarding the gun control in the United States where some people have been on the idea that laws on gun control should be enhanced while others supported the idea that they should be scrapped and there should no be rules governing gun control in the country.
Gun Control Essay. Do we really need gun control? America has recently witnessed a number of shooting and indiscriminate firing incidents in schools, malls, and villages. The culprits were either detained or killed. Some took their own lives before the police could even respond to the scene. In the end, America keeps losing children, teachers. Persuasive Pro Gun Control Essay Gun control is a vital necessity to the welfare of our nation. Many people out there are supporting the “anti- gun control cause” with the excuse of “self-defense”. I believe that not everyone will handle a gun for self-defense.