Just as any other essay, an argumentative essay on gun control comprises of three parts: In the introducing paragraph, you present your topic to the reader by giving some relevant background information and stating your standpoint on the issue in your thesis statement.
The main body of your essay will consist of three parts: In the conclusion of your gun control argumentative essay, you briefly re-state your standpoint and why it is the right one.
Persuasive essays are largely similar to argumentative ones, so much that it may be difficult to pinpoint the difference at first. This difference mainly lies in the ways by which you prove the rightness of your claim. Let us take a closer look at these ways. The commonly accepted classification suggests three main methods of persuasion: Logos employs logic to appeal to the reader's rationality.
Pathos uses the irrational and appeals to emotion. Ethos employs authority and appeals to the sense of ethics. As we have mentioned, an argumentative essay focuses on proving the rightness of your argument rationally - so, it employs logos as the only method of persuasion. In a persuasive essay, on the other hand, you focus on your result - persuading your reader. Thus, you can employ whichever of the three methods of persuasion you like in any combination.
When we talk specifically about gun control, it is a heavily emotional topic, so it is hard to stick to dry facts and logic exclusively. So, when writing a gun control persuasive essay, not only logical but also ethical and emotional appeal is probably much easier than writing an argumentative essay and sticking to logic.
Consequentially, an argumentative essay suggests that you use neutral language at all times, whereas in a persuasive essay you can relax and write in moderately emotional language here and there. The writing and pre-writing processes for a persuasive essay will not be different from those for an argumentative one: As we have discussed, gun control is an extremely broad and multi-angled topic.
Naturally, it is much bigger than one can cover in any essay, and you can investigate this topic in a gun control research paper or even bigger academic papers. If you choose to write a research paper on gun control, however, you will still find that the topic is too broad and you will have to narrow it down according to your personal and academic interest.
Still, if you find a particular gun control-related topic interesting, it is not enough to make a good topic for a research paper. It also has to be original, i. On the bright side, you usually will not have to pick a fixed topic and stick to it. At the initial stage of your work, you can formulate your subject somewhat vaguely and specify and adjust the topic to your liking with the course of your research.
Another distinct feature of a research paper is that it needs a presentable list of referenced sources. You do not have to stick to other authors' writing here. You are also allowed often even encouraged to get and use your own empirical findings. One final thing that you need to know about a research paper is that it needs to focus on the research data - facts and analytics, rather than opinions and reflections - your own or those of other authors.
Gun control is one of those topics that encourage us to be biased and express opinions. Hence, there are lots of opinions on gun control out there - both pro and anti, - and most probably, you have one as well. However, when you are writing an academic paper, you cannot make your writing strictly opinion-based. Regardless of what kind of assignment you are writing, everything you write there has to refer to hard evidence. In other words, any kind of paper on gun control demands profound research.
You need to be well informed about the background of the issue and both sides of the argument. As you know, the very issue of individual firearm possession and its control date back to the late 18 th century and the famous Second Amendment. So, this is where you begin your research you should be familiar with the text of the Second Amendment. Given the amount of time that has passed since then, the understanding of the Second Amendment has evolved, which is marked by a number of notable court cases, about which you also need to be aware.
The most significant of them include United States v. Cruikshank , the United States v. Miller , District of Columbia v.
Heller , McDonald v. The City of Chicago , and others. However, being familiar with the background of the issue will only make your own opinion more reasoned, and this is not enough to put together an academic paper.
You will also need be familiar with the current line of thought in both pro and anti gun control directions. To do that, you should read the gun control articles and watch the documentaries on the issue from reputable news sources, such as Businessweek, New Yorker, Times, CNN, and others. Anti gun control articles are written by experts who are convinced that individual firearm possession should not be controlled more than it already is or should not be controlled at all.
You can begin your research by looking through these articles:. DePhilippis and Hughes have co-founded the site Armed With Reason to inform people about gun violence prevention. The article centers around the idea that introducing more strict gun control regulations does not decrease gun violence because criminals procure firearms illegally anyway.
Wilson is an author of several books on crime and teaches at Pepperdine University. The article blames the gun control lobby of populism and points out that they have no suggestions as to what to do with the existing amount of guns owned by individuals: Hardy is an attorney from Arizona.
He claims that as an anti gun control person, he is open to dialogue with the opponent side, which he cannot say about them. He claims that they are like fanatics on a crusade who will not stop until all individual firearm possession is banned. Taya Kyle is the widow of the late Chris Kyle whose story was the basis for the movie American Sniper.
She wrote this emotional and insightful piece to express her views on the issue. If you want to read more about it, she also has written a book American Wife: Davidson interviews James Jacobs, the director of the Center for Research in Crime and Justice at New York University School of Law, to pinpoint the definition of gun control as exactly as possible and to question the most popular approaches to gun control. In this article, Davidson clarifies what gun control actually is and puts to question various popularly suggested gun control methods.
Hunter serves as an aide to the conservative Senator Rand Paul. In his article, he claims that gun control lobbyists only notice the cases where mass shootings occur while ignoring the instances where well-intended gun-owning citizens have prevented crime and violence. He also lists some inspiring stories of the latter instances.
Pro gun control articles are written by people who are not enthusiastic about the current gun control policy and suggest that either it should be more strict, or individual firearm possession should be downright outlawed. Here are some of the most interesting examples:. Gun Control and the Constitution: Should We Amend the Second Amendment?
Barrett points out that the language of the Second Amendment is too vague, which leaves it too open to interpretation. The article calls for a completely new regulation that will be more precisely formulated and limit the individual firearm possession to the militia.
Bovy claims that all the current talk around gun control is futile and pointless and that the only way to stop gun violence once and for all is to outlaw all individual firearm possession. LePore takes an in-depth look into the issue, starting with the Second Amendment and investigating how our understanding of this document has evolved since then, also noting how guns are different today from what they were years ago. Before landing a job at The Atlantic, Hamblin was fired from his previous workplace for drafting a piece on draft control.
He speculates that the people involved politicize the issue too much instead of discussing it as it is. And there is no surprise in that, considering the tragic events that took place recently.
The discussion around gun control has been lasting for as long as this country exists, but it has become an even more pressing issue after those mass shootings. It is being discussed everywhere — in the media, in the scientific journals on social studies, in the city councils and in the Congress. No wonder this topic also gets its share of attention in classrooms and every student has to write at least one gun control essay in the course of studies.
Truly, gun control gives the most fertile ground for debate. Some people stand on pro gun control positions and claim that the existing gun control regulations are critically insufficient. Other people argue that criminals procure guns illegally anyway, so conscious citizens should also have free access to firearms for self-defense.
Between these two extremes, there is also a great variety of viewpoints and opinions. If you want to discuss such a sensitive issue in an academic paper, you cannot afford to have an opinion based on nothing, like some people have. You have to be well-informed on the background of the issue, as well as on all the multitude of expert opinions about it. To do that, you first have to look at where it all began — the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States that was passed in and granted the individuals the right to possess firearms.
Since then, the understanding of the Second Amendment has evolved a great deal, and we are still far from consensus on this question. The discussion continues on all levels, and a student's gun control essay is really just as good ground to discuss it as any other. A research on any topic suggests looking through all the information you find on this topic. With gun control, you will have no problem finding information, since there is a lot of it out there.
In fact, the amount of information on this topic is quite overwhelming — much more than one can digest at a time and much more than one may need to write an excellent essay.
Given these massive amounts of potential sources of information, you should make sure that you are not wasting your time looking through sources that are irrelevant to your topic, even if they may be quite an exciting read.
To do that, you need to make your research well planned out and know where to look the relevant information. As we have already pointed out, when you want to get yourself well-informed on any particular issue, you begin with investigating its roots. When we talk about gun control discussion, it all roots from the Second Amendment.
It was passed along with the rest of the Bill of Rights at the very dawn of our country in the late 18 th century. There, the right for individual gun possession was first formulated and regulated. This document is the source of our entire understanding of individual gun possession, so you need to be familiar with this document if you look to talk about gun control and be taken seriously.
Much time has passed since then, and there have been many precedents where the court had to rule to clarify certain aspects of the Second Amendment — on both state and federal levels. The most noteworthy relevant court cases are as follows:.
These and some other court cases have largely contributed to today's understanding of individual possession and gun control, so being familiar with them is also necessary for building your expertise on gun control. Getting familiar with the historical background of the gun control discussion is only half of your research. You will also need to be aware of the present-day state of this ongoing discussion. To make it easier for you, we have taken the liberty and put together a selection of insightful pieces from both sides of the gun control discussion.
These pro gun control articles state that the current gun control regulations are not effective enough to confront gun violence and talk about how the situation can be improved:. Since everybody talks about gun control today, Amanda Marcotte of the Rolling Stone magazine has also come up with this surprisingly insightful piece. She does not claim to be an expert but rather speaks from the stand of one of the people at whom pro-gun arguments are supposed to aim, and explains why they don't work.
If you feel like you are not well-informed enough about gun control, this article is priceless for you. It briefly sums up the spirit of the Second Amendment as it was years ago and follows its evolution through the years, as well as the evolution of firearms themselves.
This article is a detailed overview of the present-day gun control regulations in California, which is arguably the strictest in the land. They conclude by stating that the current regulations are not effective enough, as they involve a number of loopholes.
The authors suggest that the regulations should be made even stricter. Gun Control and the Constitution: Should We Amend the Second Amendment? Barrett points out that the language in the text of the Second Amendment is quite vague and leaves too much room for interpretation. So, instead of fixing or clarifying it, he suggests that a whole newest of regulations is necessary, clear and direct.
Bovy takes a more radical stand in this discussion. She claims that we need to get rid of individual gun possession as a whole, with no exceptions. In his time, Hamblin was fired for drafting a piece on gun control that was not approved by his superiors. In this article, he talks about how unhealthily politicized the topic is and how our society is incapable of seeing it as it is and not as an attack on our whole set of rights and freedoms.
These anti gun control articles insist that the existing gun control regulations are ineffective because they are too strict and suggest that these regulations need to be loosened. Here is what the experts from this side of the argument have to say:. DePhilippis and Hughes are convinced that the opinion that stricter gun regulations can end gun violence is wrong and that it is a myth that needs to be debunked.
If you want to read more from them, feel free to check out their gun violence prevention site Armed With Reason. Davidson takes a scholarly approach on the issue. He attempts to give a definition of gun control and critically scrutinize the most common gun control approaches and methods.
This emotional piece is written by the widow of Chris Kyle whose tragic story was put on screen in American Sniper. If you want to know more about her take on gun control policy, you can read about it on her book American Wife: As a recognized author of books on crime and a respected teacher at Pepperdine University, Wilson uses his expertise to analyze what exactly pro gun control side has to offer.
He concludes that they are being too populist and have no concrete plan of action. Hunter works of Rand Paul, the conservative senator. The article focuses on stories where gun-owning individuals helped to confront crime and violence, as opposed to the stories where such individuals cause violence — that the pro gun control lobbyists like to manipulate. Hardy is a practicing attorney from Arizona. He blames pro gun control activists for being deaf to arguments from the anti gun control camp and incapable of a constructive dialogue.
According to him, they only see their position and will not rest until all individual firearm possession is banned for good. Being well-informed about the gun control debate is crucial for writing an excellent gun control essay, but it is still only half the battle.
You still need to know what kind of essay you have to submit and what your teacher expects of you. Here are the kinds of gun control essays that you may have to write:.
Since gun control is an extremely debatable topic, it is most exciting to talk about which side of the debate is right. This is why, students most often have to write either argumentative or persuasive essays on gun control. If you have to write a persuasive essay, you know what you should do first — pick a topic that can inspire a debate between at least two opposing sides.
You also need a compelling argument that you will defend. Here, you also have nothing to worry about, because both sides of the gun control debate have numerous compelling arguments.
Essay about Persuasive Articles on Gun Control - Persuasive Articles on Gun Control Persuading an audience can be done in several different fashions, one of which is Hugh Rank’s Model of Persuasion.
Persuasive gun control essay. A persuasive essay is where you have to convince an opponent that you are right. For example, you can try and convince a pro gun control lobbyist that strict regulations are not the answer to a problem.
Persuasive Speech Outline Gun Control Brandon Nelson Comm Persuasive Speech Outline Gun Control Is Stripping Away Your Right to Protect Yourself Introduction It’s late at night and you’re in bed. You hear a loud crashing noise coming from another room and it jolts you awake. The good thing about writing a persuasive essay on gun control is that they are pretty straight forward in their structure and organization. When writing about gun control, your essay should do the following: Mastering a Persuasive Essay Outline: Learn To Convince People.
Persuasive gun control essay. In a persuasive essay, you set out to convince an opponent that your opinion is correct and their opinion is incorrect. You can try and convince a hypothetical anti gun control lobbyist that stricter gun control regulations are necessary. No matter what side you argue, this post will point you to some credible sources for your argumentative gun control essay. 6 Supporting Gun Control Articles. Pro-gun control article #1: Gun Control and the Constitution: Should We Amend the Second Amendment?